Simpler.RunCleantech
S$5.50 per sqft a month, asking shop rent2,045 taps a working day at this corner’s stops
The published record for this corner: measured numbers with their receipts, named absences where the record is empty. No scores, no forecasts, nothing invented.
the band is the island’s middle half; the mark is this corner
ihow this figure was read
- n=1
- This rests on 1 unit. URA prints no median under 3 contracts: its own disclosure floor, read from its panel. Read it as one landlord's number rather than a market.
- unchanged since Jul 2026 · 4 days
- This asking price was posted 2026-07-30 and had stood 4 days when the listings were read. It is the landlord's own date, carried from the portal, and it is known for every listing behind this figure. An age measured on a minority of a pool is not that pool's age, so a row that cannot say is not given one.
- units of 925 sqft
- The unit behind this figure is 925 sqft (86 sqm). It is the portal's own published floor area, the same denominator the per-sqm figure was divided by, and the number that decides which of URA's size bands this row is weighed against.
- source
- listings.commercialguru.street-ask:carried · measured on CLEANTECH LOOP, 100% of whose 3 geocoded postals sit in this corner, so it is filed at this corner at subzone grain · :carried = aggregated up from finer measurements (streets, postals, doors) into this grain, never a direct reading at it · as of 2026-08-03 · a census: all 1 sources known in this subzone answered · 1 unit, 1 agent. One ask: a point, not a range · units of 925 sqft · unchanged since Jul 2026 · 4 days
2 rent readings measured here do not lead this card: not shop space
The app draws this corner’s buildings, shows it on the island map, checks a rent you were quoted against this record and runs your own numbers.
Open Cleantech in the app →This page never scores a door and never predicts a business. You know your margin, staffing and opex; we publish what the ground measures. (The one number that pretended to score was withdrawn on 2026-08-05.)
Every receipt for this corner ↓ What this issurface written 2026-10-12. Every figure on this page is read from that one file
Cleantech: every published receipt
How to read a row: the bold figure is the middle of its range and the figures either side are the range’s ends; “carried” means aggregated up from finer measurements (streets, postals, doors) into this corner, never a direct reading at it. The n is the count behind the figure: contracts, awards, units or taps, by instrument. An absent row carries a code and a side, never an instrument or a date, because nothing was measured. Every rent row was measured per square metre a month by its publisher (URA’s street medians, HDB’s awards over their printed floor area, the portals’ asks) and is printed here per square foot, divided once by this record’s own bridge of 10.76 sqft per sqm.
suppressed_at_source: withheld or not published at source. GHS 2025 printed a dash for this cell — small counts are withheld to prevent identification of individuals, and suppression is not a population of zero. The dash is denser in the age x sex strata than in the pooled total, which is what suppression of small cells looks like and is itself information
suppressed_at_source: withheld or not published at source. GHS publishes no usable dwelling mix for this subzone — SingStat printed a dash, which its own footnotes define as nil OR negligible OR suppressed — three different worlds one glyph cannot distinguish, so this is recorded as the publisher withholding, never as zero. The household count here is the same divide as the spend weights, and with no residents-by-dwelling there is nothing to divide
GHS 2025: employed RESIDENTS by workplace planning area. Foreign-worker commuters are outside the frame entirely, so this is a FLOOR on true daytime workers; no-fixed-location (201,500) and work-from-home (82,200) sit in categories, not areas. Planning-area grain: the table publishes nothing finer, so every subzone in WESTERN WATER CATCHMENT with premises, taps or residents published at the corner shows this same figure.
singstat.ghs2025.C020148 · planningArea grain
a census: all 1 sources known in this subzone answered
listings.commercialguru.street-ask:carried · subzone grain
not_yet_wired: a gap on OUR side of the pipeline. no hdb-tender fact, valued or absent, reached this subzone, and an unexplained gap is ours by rule
a census: all 1 sources known in this subzone answered
no class word rides this row's facet, so nothing says it is shop space. The shop-rent slot is led only by a row whose publisher's own facet SAYS shopfront. Written the other way round, a portal adding a new type word would leak straight into it, which is how an "Model: Food And Beverage" tag on a warehouse listing got there
listings.commercialguru.street-ask:carried · subzone grain
a census: all 1 sources known in this subzone answered
the publisher's own facet types this row "factory-workshop", which is not shop space. Measured over every per-sqm rent in this artifact, the median of the 804 shopfront rows sits at 4.1x the median of the 85 rows typed "factory-workshop". Two markets, and this one is not the shop market. The figure is real for what it measures and it is not what a shop costs here
listings.srx.postal-ask:carried · subzone grain
not_yet_wired: a gap on OUR side of the pipeline. no residential-rent fact, valued or absent, reached this subzone, and an unexplained gap is ours by rule
no_shopfront_zoned: withheld by our own rule. The figure is published one grain up and not placed here. District 22 stamps a Level 1 (street level) shop-space band of S$13.71–54.22 psf, and this corner is outside the market it describes: under the Master Plan 2025 with amendments, no parcel in this subzone is zoned for a use a ground-floor trade can occupy. The plan does not permit a shopfront here. The land here is business park (55% of 21 parcels). Rather than dress a corner with no room for a shop in its district's shop rent, the band is withheld. The district figure is real, its placement here is not. Zoning is permission, not supply: this is the plan's refusal, never a count of shops.
ura.masterplan2025.landuse · subzone grain · Master Plan 2025 with amendments, published 2026-09-21 · 2026-09-21 is the day URA published this layer on data.gov.sg (Amendment to Master Plan 2025 Land Use Layer, d_7a03324bed531cdff76a16239b0e84e1, URA's stamp 2026-09-21T13:51:24+08:00): the Master Plan 2025, gazetted on 2025-12-01, with URA's amendments in it. A zone URA changes after this date is not in this figure until URA publishes the layer again and this figure is rebuilt
URA PMI district median at DISTRICT grain, not measured at this corner. ALL of this corner's geocoded postals sit in District 22. The stratum is Level 1 (street level), declared here because URA stamps no all-levels, all-bands district median: the 3 size bands pool UNWEIGHTED: lo the lowest of the bands' lows, hi the highest of their highs, mid the median of band medians, because URA publishes no contract counts to weight with; n=3 is its disclosure floor, not a sample size. Read the bands and match your own floor area.
ura.pmi.district-median · district grain · 2026-06-30 is the last day of the quarter URA's rental-contract table covers. The figure is the district median of every contract signed across those three months in the stratum, so this is the period the median describes and not a day any particular lease was signed
ura.pmi.district-median · district grain · 2026-06-30 is the last day of the quarter URA's rental-contract table covers. The figure is the district median of every contract signed across those three months in the stratum, so this is the period the median describes and not a day any particular lease was signed
ura.pmi.district-median · district grain · 2026-06-30 is the last day of the quarter URA's rental-contract table covers. The figure is the district median of every contract signed across those three months in the stratum, so this is the period the median describes and not a day any particular lease was signed
ura.pmi.district-median · district grain · 2026-06-30 is the last day of the quarter URA's rental-contract table covers. The figure is the district median of every contract signed across those three months in the stratum, so this is the period the median describes and not a day any particular lease was signed
| day | window | mode | dir | taps/day | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| weekday | am-peak | bus | in | 66 | 92 |
| weekday | am-peak | bus | out | 748 | 92 |
| weekend-holiday | am-peak | bus | in | 21 | 32 |
| weekend-holiday | am-peak | bus | out | 42 | 32 |
| weekday | pm-peak | bus | in | 539 | 92 |
| weekday | pm-peak | bus | out | 38 | 92 |
| weekend-holiday | pm-peak | bus | in | 36 | 32 |
| weekend-holiday | pm-peak | bus | out | 11 | 32 |
| weekday | all-day | bus | in | 967 | 92 |
| weekday | all-day | bus | out | 1,078 | 92 |
| weekend-holiday | all-day | bus | in | 137 | 32 |
| weekend-holiday | all-day | bus | out | 118 | 32 |
this subzone, all trades: BUS taps only per gazetted day (no rail is counted in this number) a census: all 4 sources known in this subzone answered
lta.pv.per-day:carried · subzone grain · month to 2026-07-31 · 2026-07-31 is the last day of the month LTA's passenger-volume table covers. The figure is a per-day rate over that whole month's taps, so it names the month, not a day anything was counted
| nearest, beyond the serving line | taps/day | from the corner’s edge |
|---|---|---|
| PIONEER (EW28) | 61,475 | 1,173m to Exit B |
ENTRIES AND EXITS SUMMED on an average weekday, all day. Not boardings. NO station stands within 400m of this corner, which is the radius at which we are willing to say one serves it. The nearest is named anyway, with the same straight-line measurement to its nearest published exit. A corner 20m past the line is not a corner with no railway, and publishing nothing there would be a binary answer to a continuous question. It is not a walking route, and no claim is made that this station serves this corner.
lta.pv.per-day · station grain · month to 2026-07-31 · 2026-07-31 is the last day of the month LTA's passenger-volume table covers. The figure is a per-day rate over that whole month's taps, so it names the month, not a day anything was counted
| nearest, outside this corner | stalls | status | distance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jurong West Hawker Centre | 39 | Existing (new) | 902m |
NEA lists NO hawker centre in this corner. Its registry is a census of 129 centres, each carrying its own point, and every one of them was placed (none fell outside a subzone), so this is a measured zero rather than a corner nobody looked at. The nearest is Jurong West Hawker Centre, 902m from this corner's edge, and it is named for the same reason the nearest station is: a centre just over the boundary is not a centre that does not exist, and a straight "none here" would be a binary answer to a continuous question. Straight-line to its published point, not a walking route, and no claim is made that it sits in this corner.
nea.ssot.hawker-centres · subzone grain · as of 2026-03-13 · 2026-03-13 is NEA's own last-refresh stamp (FMEL_UPD_D) on the freshest row in this registry extract, not a survey date. A measured zero is only as current as the census behind it, and this is that census's date
suppressed_at_source: withheld or not published at source. GHS publishes no usable dwelling mix for this subzone, so the bridge has no weights: a dash that means nil OR suppressed, and a bridge without weights would be the national number wearing a subzone's name. What is withheld is the dwelling MIX: a resident population may still publish above
not_published: withheld or not published at source. SingStat publishes the GHS 2025 household income distribution by PLANNING AREA and names 29 of them; WESTERN WATER CATCHMENT is not one, so the households here sit inside the table's "Others" row together with 25 other planning areas. That row is an aggregate, not a place, and splitting it would mean inventing a share nobody published. This is the publisher pooling a small resident population, never a statement that households here earn little or that nobody counted them.
not_yet_wired: a gap on OUR side of the pipeline. no home-prices fact, valued or absent, reached this subzone, and an unexplained gap is ours by rule
a census: all 2 sources known in this subzone answered
sfa.trackrecord.by-postal:carried · subzone grain · 2026-08-17 is the newest night SFA's register was read among the 2 postals pooled here; the oldest postal's night is 2026-08-13. Each postal's count is the register as it stood on its own night, so this total spans more than one reading and no single night describes it
| largest use classes | share of zoned land |
|---|---|
| business park | 55% |
| road | 33% |
| park | 9.7% |
Counted as shopfront-capable: commercial, commercial & residential, residential with commercial at 1st storey, white, business park - white, hotel.
no parcel in this subzone is zoned for a use a ground-floor trade can occupy. The plan does not permit a shopfront here ZONING IS PERMISSION, NOT SUPPLY. This is the share of this corner's zoned land whose use class can hold a shopfront (COMMERCIAL, COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL, RESIDENTIAL WITH COMMERCIAL AT 1ST STOREY, WHITE, BUSINESS PARK - WHITE, HOTEL) under the Master Plan 2025 with amendments. Not floor space that exists, not units for rent, and not a promise any particular unit is licensed for your trade. A low share means the plan gives a shopfront little room here; a high share does not mean anything is built. Each parcel is counted whole in the subzone holding its centroid.
ura.masterplan2025.landuse · subzone grain · published 2026-09-21 · 2026-09-21 is the day URA published this layer on data.gov.sg (Amendment to Master Plan 2025 Land Use Layer, d_7a03324bed531cdff76a16239b0e84e1, URA's stamp 2026-09-21T13:51:24+08:00): the Master Plan 2025, gazetted on 2025-12-01, with URA's amendments in it. A zone URA changes after this date is not in this figure until URA publishes the layer again and this figure is rebuilt
a census: all 2 sources known in this subzone answered
sfa.trackrecord.by-postal:carried · subzone grain · 2026-08-17 is the newest night SFA's register was read among the 2 postals pooled here; the oldest postal's night is 2026-08-13. Each postal's count is the register as it stood on its own night, so this total spans more than one reading and no single night describes it
a census: all 1 sources known in this subzone answered
ecda.centres.licensed:carried · subzone grain · 2026-02-11 is ECDA's own last_updated stamp on the newest register row counted here: the day a row of the register was last touched, not a licence date and not an opening day
a census: all 4 sources known in this subzone answered
sfa.trackrecord.by-postal:carried · subzone grain · 2026-08-17 is the newest night SFA's register was read among the 4 postals pooled here; the oldest postal's night is 2026-08-13. Each postal's count is the register as it stood on its own night, so this total spans more than one reading and no single night describes it
a census: all 1 sources known in this subzone answered
a licence overlay, not a trade: a minimart and a petrol station both hold one
hsa.tobacco.retail-licence:carried · subzone grain · 2026-08-07 is HSA's refresh stamp on the register file (data.gov.sg lastUpdatedAt), not a licence date: every row on the register is a licence window, and _meta.build.tobacco counts how many had lapsed or not yet begun at that stamp
| quantity | code | side | rows |
|---|---|---|---|
| people.count | suppressed_at_source | theirs | 59 |
| householdSpend.monthly | suppressed_at_source | theirs | 513 |
Every absent fact carries a reason and a side. "Ours" is our pipeline's backlog; "theirs" is the publisher withholding. Only one of them is fixable by us.